Free enterprise, professional ideology, and self-interest: an analysis of resistance by Canadian physicians to universal health insurance.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Globerman J;Globerman J
  • Source:
    Journal of health and social behavior [J Health Soc Behav] 1990 Mar; Vol. 31 (1), pp. 11-27.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Sage Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0103130 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0022-1465 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00221465 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Health Soc Behav Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage
      Original Publication: 1967-1981: Albany, N.Y. : American Sociological Association
    • Subject Terms:
      Economic Competition* ; Economics* ; National Health Programs* ; Power, Psychological*; Physicians/*psychology; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Canada ; Humans ; Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics ; Reimbursement Mechanisms/legislation & jurisprudence
    • Abstract:
      Under Canada's universal health care system, physicians are remunerated through government-run health insurance plans; a private market for physicians' services is virtually nonexistent. A proposal to ban the practice of extra-billing, whereby some physicians billed patients for amounts over and above insured rates, met with physicians' opposition. The particular constellation of legislative, social, and political events that followed the proposed ban presented a unique opportunity to explore the nature of the medical profession's resistance to encroachment on professional autonomy. The results of this survey of physicians in four specialties (N = 313) in metropolitan Toronto suggest that resistance to universal health insurance is complex; it involves a prevailing social ideology among physicians, which happens to be antiwelfare and conservative generally, entangled with economic self-interest and a specific set of beliefs about medical practice and physicians' rights and privileges.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 19900301 Date Completed: 19900419 Latest Revision: 20191210
    • Publication Date:
      20240627
    • Accession Number:
      2313074