Cross-cultural differences in distributive justice: a comparison of Turkey and the U.S.

Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0376372 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0022-4545 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00224545 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Soc Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: 2010- : New York : Routledge
Original Publication: Provincetown, Mass. : Journal Press

Culture* ; Decision Making* ; Social Perception*; Resource Allocation/*ethics ; Social Justice/*psychology; Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Female ; Human Characteristics ; Humans ; Male ; Psychological Techniques ; Turkey ; United States ; Young Adult

When allocators make decisions about distributing resources, they face a dilemma if the expectations for consequences that will flow from particular choices are incongruent with each other. For example, a certain allocation choice might be expected to make an allocator appear warm and likable but unfair. Previous research has found that culture can shape these perceptions and, thus, their congruence or incongruence. The present study further investigated these ideas. Differences between Turkish and U.S. students' perceptions of allocators who distributed resources on the basis of merit vs. need were investigated. Results revealed an allocation dilemma among the U.S. but not among the Turkish students. Specifically, the U.S. students perceived greater incongruence among allocation consequences for both merit and need choices than did the students from Turkey for whom perceptions of allocator's fairness were more aligned with perceptions of allocator's warmth.

Date Created: 20120508 Date Completed: 20120605 Latest Revision: 20120504

20240829

10.1080/00224545.2011.614969

22558829