Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Greiver M;Greiver M; Barnsley J; Glazier RH; Moineddin R; Harvey BJ
  • Source:
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien [Can Fam Physician] 2011 Oct; Vol. 57 (10), pp. e390-7.
  • Publication Type:
    Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: College of Family Physicians of Canada Country of Publication: Canada NLM ID: 0120300 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1715-5258 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0008350X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Can Fam Physician Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Don Mills, Ont. : College of Family Physicians of Canada
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To apply the diffusion-of-innovations theory to the examination of factors that are perceived by family physicians as influencing the implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs).
      Design: Qualitative study with 2 focus groups 18 months after EMR implementation; participants also took part in a concurrent quantitative study examining EMR implementation and preventive services.
      Setting: Toronto, Ont.
      Participants: Twelve community-based family physicians.
      Methods: We employed a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim; 2 researchers independently categorized and coded the transcripts and then met to compare and contrast their findings, category mapping, and interpretations. Findings were then mapped to an existing theoretical framework.
      Main Findings: Multiple barriers to EMR implementation were described. These included lack of relative advantage for many processes, high complexity of the system, low compatibility with physician needs and past experiences, difficulty with adaptation of the EMR to the organization and adaptation of the organization to the EMR, and lack of organizational slack. Positive factors were the presence of a champion and relative advantages for some processes.
      Conclusion: Early EMR implementation experience is consistent with theoretical concepts associated with implementation of innovations. A problematic implementation process helps to explain, at least in part, the lack of improvement in preventive services in our quantitative results.
    • References:
      J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):457-64. (PMID: 19390094)
      Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):963-7. (PMID: 17911858)
      Int J Med Inform. 2009 Apr;78(4):270-83. (PMID: 18819836)
      N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2218-27. (PMID: 12773650)
      Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138. (PMID: 17319808)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 06;10:231. (PMID: 20691097)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):116-26. (PMID: 15046136)
      Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):180-6. (PMID: 10758083)
      BMJ. 2008 Oct 23;337:a1786. (PMID: 18948344)
      Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):e381-9. (PMID: 21998246)
      Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;:22-6. (PMID: 11825150)
      Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(3):176-85. (PMID: 11186051)
      BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 31;9:52. (PMID: 20043843)
      Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):300-6. (PMID: 16046561)
      BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. (PMID: 7633241)
      BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6. (PMID: 10625273)
      JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. (PMID: 15755945)
      JAMA. 2003 Apr 16;289(15):1969-75. (PMID: 12697800)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):298-303. (PMID: 12897365)
      Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):209-15. (PMID: 17548848)
      Can Fam Physician. 2008 May;54(5):730-6. (PMID: 18474707)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20111015 Date Completed: 20120214 Latest Revision: 20211020
    • Publication Date:
      20240628
    • Accession Number:
      PMC3192105
    • Accession Number:
      21998247