Are things that are hard to physically move also hard to imagine moving?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Flusberg SJ;Flusberg SJ; Boroditsky L
  • Source:
    Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2011 Feb; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 158-64.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer] Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9502924 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-5320 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10699384 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychon Bull Rev Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
      Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
    • Subject Terms:
      Imagination* ; Motion Perception* ; Orientation* ; Pattern Recognition, Visual* ; Psychomotor Performance* ; Weight Perception*; Color Perception ; Concept Formation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Reaction Time
    • Abstract:
      Are objects that are more difficult to physically manipulate also more difficult to mentally manipulate? In our study, participants interacted with wooden objects modeled after the figures from Shepard and Metzler's (1971) classic mental rotation experiment. One pair of objects was easy to physically rotate while another pair was difficult. They then completed a standard mental rotation task on images of these objects. Participants were slower to mentally rotate objects that were harder to physically rotate when they engaged in motor imagery. Further, this cost accrued with increasing angles of rotation. We verified this was the result of motor imagery by showing that the costs can be eliminated by using a strictly visual imagery strategy (imagining the objects moving on their own). These results reveal a striking constraint imposed by our real-world motor experiences on mental imagery, and also demonstrate a way that we can overcome such constraints.
    • References:
      Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Dec;9(6):735-9. (PMID: 10607647)
      Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):635-42. (PMID: 11533731)
      J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1655-65. (PMID: 11185788)
      Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(1):77-94. (PMID: 9775517)
      Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):87-93. (PMID: 8713549)
      Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):478-84. (PMID: 10988041)
      J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):480-97. (PMID: 7790829)
      Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):106-12. (PMID: 12661670)
      Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):110-22. (PMID: 26151466)
      Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):276-84. (PMID: 19853246)
      Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2519-25. (PMID: 11496141)
      J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):830-46. (PMID: 9627419)
      J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1458-71. (PMID: 19803649)
      J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):1013-23. (PMID: 11177421)
      Cogn Psychol. 1999 May;38(3):433-64. (PMID: 10328859)
      J Neurosci. 1996 Dec 1;16(23):7688-98. (PMID: 8922425)
      Science. 1971 Feb 19;171(3972):701-3. (PMID: 5540314)
      Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6. (PMID: 9176952)
      Cogn Psychol. 1987 Apr;19(2):178-241. (PMID: 3581757)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20110218 Date Completed: 20110627 Latest Revision: 20211020
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.3758/s13423-010-0024-2
    • Accession Number:
      21327358