Differential activation of judgments in employee well-being.

APPLIED psychology; WELL-being; EMPLOYEES; COGNITIVE psychology; RESEARCH; RESPONSE consistency; DECISION making; INDUSTRIAL psychology

To complement environment-centred perspectives on employee well-being, which primarily examine the characteristics of external stimuli, a two-component framework is presented of cognitive processes in responding to those stimuli. First, it is argued that the experience of well-being derives in part from up to eight kinds of judgment, which operate on an environmental input. These judgments include comparisons with other people, alternative situations and other times, and assessments against three personal reference points: significance for self, relevant self-efficacy, and novelty or familiarity. The framework's second component sets out situational and personal factors that may differentially promote activation of the judgments. Evidence is reviewed for each judgment's role in well-being and for the proposed activation contingencies, and a research agenda is presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)