The age prospective memory paradox: young adults may not give their best outside of the lab.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0260564 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1939-0599 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00121649 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Dev Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Washington DC : American Psychological Association
      Original Publication: Richmond, Va., American Psychological Assn.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Previous research has identified the age prospective memory paradox of age-related declines in laboratory settings in contrast to age benefits in naturalistic settings. Various factors are assumed to account for this paradox, yet empirical evidence on this issue is scarce. In 2 experiments, the present study examined the effect of task setting in a laboratory task and the effect of motivation in a naturalistic task on prospective memory performance in young and older adults. For the laboratory task (Experiment 1, n = 40), we used a board game to simulate a week of daily activities and varied features of the prospective memory task (e.g., task regularity). For the naturalistic task (Experiment 2, n = 80), we instructed participants to try to remember to contact the experimenter repeatedly over the course of 1 week. Results from the laboratory prospective memory tasks indicated significant age-related decline for irregular tasks (p = .006) but not for regular and focal tasks. In addition, in the naturalistic task, the age benefit was eliminated when young adults were motivated by incentives (F < 1). In conclusion, the present results indicate that the variability of age differences in laboratory prospective memory tasks may be due in part to differences in the features of the prospective memory task. Furthermore, increases in motivation to perform the prospective task seem to help remedy prospective memory deficits in young adults in the naturalistic setting.
    • References:
      Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2007 May;14(3):236-56. (PMID: 17453559)
      Memory. 2003 May;11(3):261-75. (PMID: 12908675)
      Memory. 2001 Jan;9(1):1-11. (PMID: 11315657)
      J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 Jul;54(4):P256-69. (PMID: 12382595)
      J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 May;62(3):P149-55. (PMID: 17507582)
      Schizophr Res. 2007 Sep;95(1-3):179-85. (PMID: 17630257)
      Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1735-46. (PMID: 18062550)
      Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):203-8. (PMID: 18361667)
      Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):595-605. (PMID: 20853967)
      J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jul;16(4):717-26. (PMID: 2142956)
      J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 May;13(3):410-6. (PMID: 17445289)
      Brain Cogn. 2002 Aug;49(3):341-62. (PMID: 12139958)
      Exp Aging Res. 1993 Apr-Jun;19(2):165-76. (PMID: 8319734)
      Psychol Aging. 1997 Jun;12(2):314-27. (PMID: 9189992)
      Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):291-303. (PMID: 2378695)
      Memory. 2004 Sep;12(5):553-61. (PMID: 15615314)
      Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar;19(1):27-39. (PMID: 15065929)
      Psychol Aging. 1993 Sep;8(3):420-8. (PMID: 8216962)
      Am J Psychol. 2001 Autumn;114(3):411-23. (PMID: 11641887)
      Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Nov;194(4):497-504. (PMID: 17619860)
      Q J Exp Psychol A. 1990 Aug;42(3):471-93. (PMID: 2236631)
      J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):112-32. (PMID: 17324087)
    • Grant Information:
      T32 AG000030 United States AG NIA NIH HHS; T32 AG000030-30 United States AG NIA NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20101110 Date Completed: 20110322 Latest Revision: 20240608
    • Publication Date:
      20240608
    • Accession Number:
      PMC3071572
    • Accession Number:
      10.1037/a0020718
    • Accession Number:
      21058832