The paradox of cognitive change.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Salthouse TA;Salthouse TA
  • Source:
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology [J Clin Exp Neuropsychol] 2010 Jul; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 622-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Jan 08.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8502170 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-411X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13803395 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2013- : London : Routledge
      Original Publication: Lisse : Swets & Zeitlinger, c1985-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Properties of cognitive change scores were compared in adults over age 70, for whom longitudinal changes are often negative, and in adults in two age groups under age 70, for whom the changes are often close to zero. Longitudinal assessments of three measures of memory and three measures of speed across an average interval of 2.4 years were obtained from a sample of 1,282 healthy adults between 18 and 92 years of age. Although substantial longitudinal declines were primarily apparent in adults 70 years of age and older, adults under and over age 70 were similar with respect to the variability and reliability of the cognitive changes, and in the magnitude of the correlations of the changes with each other and with variables that have been identified as risk factors for late-life cognitive decline and dementia. It is suggested that longitudinal changes in cognition can be considered to represent a paradox in that the mean values of the changes are more negative at older ages, but the change scores have similar measurement properties, and appear to be just as systematic, among adults under and over 70 years of age.
    • References:
      JAMA. 2004 Sep 22;292(12):1454-61. (PMID: 15383516)
      Alzheimers Dement. 2006 Jan;2(1):12-32. (PMID: 19595852)
      Exp Aging Res. 2003 Jan-Mar;29(1):73-8. (PMID: 12744220)
      Psychol Aging. 2005 Mar;20(1):3-18. (PMID: 15769210)
      J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. (PMID: 16367493)
      Neurology. 2007 Nov 13;69(20):1911-20. (PMID: 17596582)
      Neuroepidemiology. 2006;27(3):143-53. (PMID: 16974109)
      J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Apr;51(4):459-65. (PMID: 12657064)
      Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jun;3(6):343-53. (PMID: 15157849)
      Psychol Aging. 1999 Jun;14(2):245-63. (PMID: 10403712)
      Neurology. 2003 Dec 9;61(11):1479-85. (PMID: 14663028)
      Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):47-53. (PMID: 17244848)
      Arch Neurol. 2005 Nov;62(11):1750-4. (PMID: 16286550)
      J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. (PMID: 1202204)
      Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2002 Dec;35(6):575-81. (PMID: 12491004)
      Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jul 23;161(14):1703-8. (PMID: 11485502)
      Neuropsychology. 2007 Jul;21(4):401-11. (PMID: 17605573)
      Psychol Aging. 1998 Dec;13(4):663-75. (PMID: 9883465)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. (PMID: 3397865)
      J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 May;57(3):P246-55. (PMID: 11983736)
      JAMA. 2002 Feb 13;287(6):742-8. (PMID: 11851541)
    • Grant Information:
      R37 AG024270 United States AG NIA NIH HHS; R37 AG024270-05 United States AG NIA NIH HHS; R37 024270 United States PHS HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20100112 Date Completed: 20100929 Latest Revision: 20211020
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC2891161
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/13803390903401310
    • Accession Number:
      20063256