Effect of resin coating on adhesion and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated all-ceramic crowns after occlusal loading: a laboratory study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9504563 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1600-0722 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09098836 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Oral Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell
      Original Publication: Copenhagen : Munksgaard, c1995-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This study investigated the effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on adhesion and microleakage of all-ceramic crowns. Molars were prepared for an all-ceramic crown and were divided into two groups: non-coated (control) and resin-coated with Clearfil Tri-S Bond. Crowns were fabricated using CEREC 3 and cemented using Clearfil Esthetic Cement. After 24 h of storage in water, the restored teeth in each group were divided into two subgroups: unloaded, or loaded while stored in water. Mechanical loading was achieved with an axial force of 80 N at 2.5 cycles s(-1) for 250,000 cycles. After immersion in Rhodamine B, the specimens were sectioned and processed for microleakage evaluation by confocal microscopy, which was followed by further sectioning for microtensile bond testing. Loading had no significant effect on microleakage in either the resin-coated or non-resin-coated groups. Resin coating did not reduce the microleakage at the dentine interface but increased the microleakage at the enamel interface. All the beams fractured during slicing when non-coated and loaded. The bond strengths of non-coated and unloaded, resin-coated and unloaded, and resin-coated and loaded groups were 15.82 +/- 4.22, 15.17 +/- 5.24, and 12.97 +/- 5.82 MPa, respectively. Resin coating with Clearfil Tri-S Bond improved the bonding of resin cement to dentine for loaded specimens. However, it was not effective in reducing the microleakage, regardless of whether it was loaded or unloaded.
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Clearfil Tri-S Bond)
      0 (Fluorescent Dyes)
      0 (Resin Cements)
      0 (Rhodamines)
      0 (clearfil esthetic cement)
      059QF0KO0R (Water)
      12001-21-7 (Dental Porcelain)
      K7G5SCF8IL (rhodamine B)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20090725 Date Completed: 20091102 Latest Revision: 20151119
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00653.x
    • Accession Number:
      19627359