Pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health care.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Buetow S;Buetow S
  • Source:
    Journal of health organization and management [J Health Organ Manag] 2008; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 36-47.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Emerald Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101179473 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1477-7266 (Print) Linking ISSN: 14777266 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Health Organ Manag
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Bradford, West Yorkshire, England : Emerald, c2003-
    • Subject Terms:
      Employee Incentive Plans/*organization & administration ; Primary Health Care/*organization & administration ; Quality Assurance, Health Care/*methods; Efficiency, Organizational ; Humans ; New Zealand ; Organizational Innovation ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Program Development ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits/classification
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: This paper aims to describe the introduction of pay-for-performance in New Zealand primary health care; compare this policy development with analogous English initiatives; discuss the risk of unintended, adverse consequences of the New Zealand programme; and consider key lessons for the policy development of pay-for-performance in health care.
      Design/methodology/approach: This article is based on description and analysis of policy developments for performance management in New Zealand and England.
      Findings: It is not clear that the New Zealand Programme appropriately reflects the values and goals of primary health care providers. It encourages slow, incremental change by paying bonuses to Primary Health Organisations, rather than practices, for meeting targets on a small number of performance indicators. The bonuses account for a tiny proportion of the total income of PHOs and in general are for service improvement rather than to supplement practitioner incomes. It is important to align performance incentives with stakeholders' values and goals.
      Originality/value: The paper discusses New Zealand developments in pay-for-performance in the context of English policy initiatives and considers lessons for all health systems.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20080521 Date Completed: 20080701 Latest Revision: 20220310
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1108/14777260810862399
    • Accession Number:
      18488518