Comment on 'Posterior to the ridge laser in zone 2 stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity with plus disease: Efficacy and safety'.

The letter published in the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology critiques a study on laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The authors highlight discrepancies in the classification of ROP stages used in the study and suggest a more detailed description of morphological features for better clinical guidance. The letter emphasizes the importance of accurate classification and individualized treatment decisions in managing ROP cases. The author, Neha K Sethi, discloses no conflicts of interest and acknowledges no financial support for the letter. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Indian Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)