Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
In Defense of Journalism and Presidential Debates.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): McKinney, Mitchell S.1 (AUTHOR)
- Source:
Journal of Media Ethics. Oct-Dec2024, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p302-305. 4p.
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
The article discusses the deficiencies in presidential debates, particularly focusing on the dialogue and argumentation of candidates. It highlights the challenges faced by journalists in fact-checking misleading claims made by political leaders during debates. The text also examines Donald Trump's disruptive behavior in the 2020 debates and the subsequent changes implemented by the Commission on Presidential Debates to maintain order. Despite the challenges, the article emphasizes the importance of debates in facilitating voter learning and promoting informed decision-making. [Extracted from the article]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Journal of Media Ethics is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.