Assessing Long-Term Adverse Outcomes in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Early Steroid Withdrawal Versus Continuous Steroid Immunosuppression Using a Large Real-World Database.

Background: Steroids are widely used in maintenance immunosuppression treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Older individuals undergo age-related immunosenescence that consequently decreases their ability to process and evoke a response to foreign antigens. Thus, steroids may not be necessary in preventing allograft rejection and may consequently increase older recipients' risk of long-term steroid-related adverse effects. Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the adverse outcomes of long-term steroid immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients using real-world electronic medical record data. Methods: The TriNetX database "US Collaborative Network" was utilized to perform a propensity score-matched case-control study comparing 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year adverse effects of steroid immunosuppression in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) kidney transplant recipients who underwent either an early-steroid withdrawal (ESW) maintenance regimen or a steroid continuous immunosuppression (SCI) regimen between 31 December, 2010 and 31 December, 2020. Early-steroid withdrawal was defined as tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil maintenance with no prednisone after the seventh day post-transplant. Steroid continuous immunosuppression was defined as tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus prednisone maintenance. Cohorts were matched on age, race/ethnicity, and risk factors for adverse steroid-related outcomes and rejection. Outcomes included post-transplant diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia osteoporosis/fractures, myocardial infarction, glaucoma/cataract, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and malignancy. Secondary outcomes analyzed incidences of infection-related outcomes, graft-related outcomes, and recipient mortality. Results: After matching, there were 304 recipients in each group (ESW, SCI). Mean age at the time of transplant was 69.2 ± 3.7 years (ESW) and 69.2 ± 3.4 years (SCI, p = 0.96). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed recipients who underwent SCI had increased incidences of post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 1 year (22.36% vs 30.37%, p = 0.01) and 3 years (34.89% vs 44.29%, p = 0.01), but this became non-significant at 5 years post-transplant (41.97% vs 42.6%, p = 0.34). Incidences of acute pancreatitis were higher for the SCI cohort at 3 years (p = 0.02) as well as incidences of acute myocardial infarction at 5 years post-kidney transplant (6.75% vs 14.39%, p < 0.01). No difference was found for other adverse outcomes. Early-steroid withdrawal recipients experienced significantly fewer infection-related outcomes, such as cytomegalovirus, BK virus, sepsis/bacteremia, and fungal infections, compared with SCI recipients. Last, recipients who underwent ESW experienced fewer incidences of rejection and death-censored graft failure at 5 years post-transplant. Conclusions: There is currently no standard maintenance immunosuppression protocol for older kidney transplant recipients. Death-censored graft survival, rejection, and patient survival were improved with ESW. Steroid minimization may be beneficial in this population given that it lowers the risk of drug-induced adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Drugs & Aging is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)