Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
מצב חירום אקלימי: הבטחה נכזבת. (Hebrew)
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): אורי שרון
- Source:
Law Studies: The Journal of Law of Tel Aviv University; 2024, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p529-590, 62p
- Additional Information
- Alternate Title:
Climate Emergency: A False Promise. (English)
- Abstract:
This article delves into an innovative legal concept: the climate emergency. The notion of declaring a climate emergency is gaining momentum across various sectors, making it a prominent topic of discussion among environmental organizations, the media, political arenas, and academic researchers. This article presents the first comprehensive exploration of the concept from a legal standpoint. It meticulously dissects its legal components and engages in an essential exploration of the legal character of a climate emergency and the question whether it should be implemented. The article contends that emergency management approaches are ill-suited to the distinctive nature of climate change. Additionally, it highlights that the climate emergency discourse itself carries inherent risks, potentially provoking public backlash that could hinder global efforts to address climate change. Consequently, the article rejects the concept of the climate emergency and instead proposes a democratic-pragmatic alternative. The article recognizes that, unlike emergency laws, disaster laws share many of the characteristics of climate laws, offering a valuable foundation for comparative analysis. It therefore suggests that when formulating climate laws, legislative and practical insights from disaster laws should be carefully examined. To illustrate the potential of this approach, the article analyzes risk management frameworks in the worlds of financial regulation and healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Law Studies: The Journal of Law of Tel Aviv University is the property of Tel Aviv University, Buchman Faculty of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.