Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Usefulness and Safety of Gelatin–Thrombin Matrix Sealants in Minimally Invasive Microscopic Discectomy.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Sakamoto, Yushi; Naruo, Seiichiro; Ozaki, Tomonori; Tahata, Shogo; Fujimoto, Toru; Ogata, Atushi; Yoshioka, Fumitaka; Nakahara, Yukiko; Masuoka, Jun; Abe, Tatsuya
- Source:
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery; Sep2024, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p478-483, 6p
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness and safety of gelatin–thrombin matrix sealants (GTMSs) in minimally invasive microscopic discectomy, a surgical procedure commonly used to treat lumbar disc herniation. Materials and Methods Out of 484 patients who underwent minimally invasive microscopic discectomy between April 2018 and December 2022, 35 patients with a history of surgery at the same level were excluded, resulting in a total of 449 patients included in the study. Among them, 316 patients were treated using GTMS, whereas 133 were treated using collagen-based absorbable local hemostatic agents. Patient characteristics, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, intraoperative dural injury, and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results No significant differences in patient demographics were observed between the two groups, except for activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time. Although there were no significant differences in the mean surgical time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups, they tended to be shorter and less in the GTMS group (56.3 ± 20.2 vs. 58.2 ± 20.4 minutes [ p = 0.36] and 10.0 ± 15.4 vs. 11.8 ± 8.3 g [ p = 0.20]). The volume of postoperative drainage was significantly lower in the GTMS group than that in the comparison group (35.3 ± 21.8 vs. 49.5 ± 34.1 g [ p < 0.01]). There was a trend indicating a difference in the number of intraoperative dural injuries and the need for reoperation due to postoperative epidural hematoma (2 vs. 3 ± 20.4 minutes [ p = 0.21] and 1 vs. 2 [ p = 0.16]). Conclusion The use of a GTMS in minimally invasive microscopic discectomy appears to be beneficial in reducing postoperative drainage volume. It has also been shown that it may improve clinical outcomes such as intraoperative dural injury and postoperative epidural hematoma. Furthermore, further consideration of the medical economic impact is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Asian Journal of Neurosurgery is the property of Thieme Medical & Scientific Publishers Private Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.