Epidural analgesia in labour and the risk of emergency caesarean: a retrospective observational study.

CESAREAN section; RISK assessment; SCIENTIFIC observation; SAMPLE size (Statistics); EMERGENCY medical services; EPIDURAL analgesia; LABOR (Obstetrics); RETROSPECTIVE studies; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; PREGNANCY outcomes; INTRAPARTUM care; MEDICAL records; ACQUISITION of data; RESEARCH; TRUST; WOMEN'S health; ANESTHESIA

Background/Aims: A Cochrane review reported that epidural analgesia had no effect on the risk of emergency caesarean section; there was a discrepancy between these findings and the author's clinical observations, prompting the author to evaluate labour outcomes for women with and without epidural analgesia. The aim was to establish whether the author's clinical observations were supported by data. Methods: A retrospective review of the outcomes of 200 labours with and without epidural analgesia was carried out, limited to women the author had personally cared for. A subsequent trust-wide analysis of labours was conducted to explore wider trends in analgesia and emergency caesarean section. Results: In the personal review, epidural analgesia was associated with a more than two-fold increase in risk of emergency caesarean section, regardless of the underlying obstetric risk factors (from 14.7% to 36.4%). A similar trend was found across the trust. Conclusions: Epidural analgesia in labour is associated with increased risk of an emergency caesarean section. Potential reasons for the discrepancy with the Cochrane review findings include differences in anaesthetic practice, timing and dilation at the time of receiving epidural analgesia, and evidence that women taking part in a randomised controlled trial experience better outcomes than those receiving routine care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]