Assessment and Treatment of Pain in Hospitalized Children at a Tertiary Children's Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey.

(1) Background: Acute pain in hospitalized children remains under-recognized and under-treated. Our objective is to benchmark pain assessment, documentation, treatment, and patient experience in children admitted to a US children's hospital. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-method survey of pain for children hospitalized ≥24 h. Charts were reviewed for modalities of pain assessment and treatment for all inpatients. If pain was documented, patients/caregivers were surveyed regarding their experience with pain and its management. (3) Results: Chart review: All 107 patients had ≥1 pain score documented. A total of 47 patients had a pain score ≥0, 35 (74.5%) of whom had ≥1 moderate-severe score. Seventy (65.4%) patients received ≥1 intervention for pain, including medications from ≥1 class (e.g., opioids) (n = 55, 51.4%) and/or integrative/non-pharmacologic intervention(s) (n = 39, 36.4%). There were assessment and documentation gaps. Patient survey: A total of 39 (83.0%) interviews were attempted; 25 (53.2%) were completed. The worst pain was mostly caused by acute illness (n = 13, 52%) and painful procedures (n = 10, 40%). Suggestions for improvement included increasing the use of integrative modalities and optimizing patient–clinician communication. (4) Conclusions: All patients admitted ≥24 h had ≥1 pain score documented; however, gaps in documentation were common. Multimodal treatment and integrative modalities were underutilized. Procedures were a frequent cause of under-treated pain, prompting an institution-wide quality improvement project. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Children is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)