Combates pela história, disputas de memórias: o caso do golpe de 1964 e a ditadura. (Portuguese)

Fights for history, disputes over memories: The case of the 1964 coup and the dictatorship. (English)

The intention of this article is to demonstrate how battles over history are always disputes over memories. To this end, I evaluate a particular case. Questioning the appeasing memories that sustain the image of a victim society resistant to dictatorship, Daniel Aarão Reis Filho reinforces, even without admitting, other collective memories linked to the political struggle and present in the historiographic debate. Namely, those who insist that society did not resist, on the contrary, was complicit, responsible, each in their own way, for the dictatorship. Including the left, who instead of being resistant democrats, were radical authoritarians [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A intenção deste artigo é demonstrar como os combates pela história são sempre disputas de memórias. Para tanto, avalio um caso em particular. Questionando as memórias apaziguadoras que sustentam a imagem da sociedade vítima resistente à ditadura, Daniel Aarão Reis Filho reforça, mesmo sem admitir, outras memórias coletivas vinculadas à luta política e presentes no debate historiográfi co. A saber, aquelas que insistem que a sociedade não resistiu, pelo contrário, foi cúmplice, responsável, cada um ao seu modo, pela ditadura. Incluindo as esquerdas, que ao invés de democratas resistentes, eram autoritárias radicais. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of História Oral is the property of Associacao Brasileira de Historia Oral and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)