Psychometric validation of the hyperglycaemia avoidance scale UK (HAS‐UK).

INSULIN therapy; TYPE 1 diabetes; RESEARCH funding; RESEARCH methodology evaluation; RESEARCH evaluation; QUESTIONNAIRES; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; INSULIN pumps; HYPERGLYCEMIA; BLOOD sugar; INJECTIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RESEARCH; FACTOR analysis; EVALUATION

Aims: Hyperglycaemia aversion in type 1 diabetes can be associated with severe hypoglycaemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia but is not routinely assessed clinically. This study aimed to undertake the first psychometric validation of the UK version of the Hyperglycaemia Avoidance Scale (HAS‐UK). Methods: The HAS‐UK was completed by adults with type 1 diabetes in three separate research studies. Psychometric properties were evaluated, using exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, and convergent validity. Results: Of the 431 participants who completed the HAS‐UK in the three studies, mean age was 49.5 years, and 58.0% were women. Mean duration of diabetes was 29 years, with 192 (44.5%) using multiple daily injections and 229 (53.1%) using an insulin pump. Five participants were excluded from analyses due to incomplete HAS‐UK responses. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 3‐factor solution, with acceptable internal consistency for 'worry' and 'blood glucose decisions' factors. HAS‐UK total score was higher in those using insulin pumps versus multiple daily injections, and 'blood glucose decisions' score was higher in those using a continuous blood glucose sensor versus a meter. Conclusions: The HAS‐UK is a reliable measure with acceptable structural validity and is likely to be useful for evaluating hyperglycaemia aversion in people with type 1 diabetes. Future research would benefit from investigating further psychometric properties including test–retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and clinical significance of scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Diabetic Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)