Loneliness and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: the moderating role of emotion regulation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      Loneliness and psychological distress have become a growing public issue, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have examined the association between loneliness and psychological distress, and how to moderate this association still was unknown. We aimed to examine the relationship between loneliness and psychological distress and the moderating role of emotion regulation. A total of 944 participants were invited to complete the measurement of the 6-item De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale, the 20-item self-report questionnaire (SRQ-20), and the emotion regulation questionnaire (ERQ) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Linear mixed-effects regressions revealed that both emotional (b = 0.26, p < 0.001) and social loneliness (b = 0.28, p < 0.001) was positively associated with psychological distress. Loneliness with high cognitive reappraisal was negatively associated with psychological distress (emotional loneliness: b = − 0.07, p = 0.02, social loneliness: b = − 0.17, p < 0.001). However, loneliness with high expressive suppression was positively associated with psychological distress ((emotional loneliness: b = 0.07, p = 0.03, social loneliness: b = 0.07, p = 0.04). We conclude that an adaptive emotion regulation strategy may be an effective way for individuals with loneliness in reducing psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Current Psychology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)