Menu
×
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Comparative Performance of COVID-19 Test Methods in Healthcare Workers during the Omicron Wave.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
- Author(s): Tornberg, Emma C.; Tomlinson, Alexander; Oshiro, Nicholas T. T.; Derfalie, Esraa; Ali, Rabeka A.; Curlin, Marcel E.
- Source:
Diagnostics (2075-4418); May2024, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p986, 11p- Subject Terms:
- Source:
- Additional Information
- Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique requirements for accessible, reliable testing, and many testing platforms and sampling techniques have been developed over the course of the pandemic. Not all test methods have been systematically compared to each other or a common gold standard, and the performance of tests developed in the early epidemic have not been consistently re-evaluated in the context of new variants. We conducted a repeated measures study with adult healthcare workers presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Participants were tested using seven testing modalities. Test sensitivity was compared using any positive PCR test as the gold standard. A total of 325 individuals participated in the study. PCR tests were the most sensitive (saliva PCR 0.957 ± 0.048, nasopharyngeal PCR 0.877 ± 0.075, oropharyngeal PCR 0.849 ± 0.082). Standard nasal rapid antigen tests were less sensitive but roughly equivalent (BinaxNOW 0.613 ± 0.110, iHealth 0.627 ± 0.109). Oropharyngeal rapid antigen tests were the least sensitive (BinaxNOW 0.400 ± 0.111, iHealth brands 0.311 ± 0.105). PCR remains the most sensitive testing modality for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and saliva PCR is significantly more sensitive than oropharyngeal PCR and equivalent to nasopharyngeal PCR. Nasal AgRDTs are less sensitive than PCR but have benefits in convenience and accessibility. Saliva-based PCR testing is a viable alternative to traditional swab-based PCR testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract: Copyright of Diagnostics (2075-4418) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Abstract:
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.