Comparison of Clinicopathological Features of Pleomorphic and Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinomas.

LOBULAR carcinoma; SURGICAL margin; OPERATIVE surgery; BREAST cancer; ESTROGEN receptors; CLINICAL pathology

Purpose: Accounting for about 15% of invasive lobular carcinomas and 1% of breast carcinomas, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma is known to be a rare histological subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma. Yet, it is more aggressive and produces a worse prognosis than other breast cancers. Ultimately, the present study compares the clinicopathological features of pleomorphic and invasive lobular breast carcinomas. Methods: In the study, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 262 patients with histological subtypes of classical and pleomorphic lobular cancers having been recruited for surgical operations. After resorting to Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests to check the normality of distribution, the categorical and continuous variables were compared between the groups using the chi-square test and independent samples t test, respectively. In all analyses, we considered a P -value of <.05 to be statistically significant. Results: Our findings revealed that the groups with lobular and pleomorphic groups significantly differed by Ki-67 value, estrogen receptor negativity, grade, multicentricity, multifocality, surgical margin positivity, completion mastectomy, and metachronous contralateral tumor (P <.05). Conclusion: We discovered that pleomorphic type was associated with higher grades, estrogen receptor negativity, and Ki-67 expression. The incidence of metachronous breast cancer was high in the pleomorphic group, which may be a noteworthy finding to be considered in follow-ups. In addition, the high rates of multicentricity and multifocality of tumors in the pleomorphic group may be associated with increased surgical margin positivity and a higher likelihood of mastectomy. In a nutshell, our findings may guide patients and surgeons regarding the type of intervention and reconstruction options to be adopted in prospective surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of American Surgeon is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)