More Process, Less Principles: The Ethics of Deploying AI and Robotics in Medicine.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Palmer, Amitabha (AUTHOR); Schwan, David (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. Jan2024, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p121-134. 14p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Current national and international guidelines for the ethical design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics emphasize ethical theory. Various governing and advisory bodies have generated sets of broad ethical principles, which institutional decisionmakers are encouraged to apply to particular practical decisions. Although much of this literature examines the ethics of designing and developing AI and robotics, medical institutions typically must make purchase and deployment decisions about technologies that have already been designed and developed. The primary problem facing medical institutions is not one of ethical design but of ethical deployment. The purpose of this paper is to develop a practical model by which medical institutions may make ethical deployment decisions about ready-made advanced technologies. Our slogan is "more process, less principles." Ethically sound decisionmaking requires that the process by which medical institutions make such decisions include participatory, deliberative, and conservative elements. We argue that our model preserves the strengths of existing frameworks, avoids their shortcomings, and delivers its own moral, practical, and epistemic advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)