Facilitators and barriers to "Positive Outcomes" from cognitive‐behavioral therapy, according to young people: A thematic synthesis.

YOUNG adults; COGNITIVE therapy; GROUP dynamics; ONLINE databases; SOCIAL groups; HELP-seeking behavior

Objective: This qualitative review sought to explore how young people (YP) conceptualize positive outcomes from cognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT) and what YP perceive to be the facilitators and barriers to positive outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in June 2021 using six online databases. Studies were included if qualitative data were collected from participants who were aged up to 25, had internalizing mental health difficulties, and had received in‐person CBT from trained practitioners. Results: Nineteen studies were included. The Gough Weight of Evidence framework was used to assess methodological and topical quality and relevance. A thematic synthesis identified 34 conceptualizations of positive outcomes, 57 facilitators, and 49 barriers. Descriptive and analytical themes were identified. In line with the review's pragmatic perspective, the latter were worded as practice recommendations: acknowledge YP's perspectives on outcomes, teach tangible CBT techniques, balance autonomy and support, frame CBT as "upskilling," explore nuanced barriers to engagement, and consider the power of group dynamics. Conclusions: This review established the range of YP's views about positive outcomes from CBT, as well as facilitators and barriers to achieving these. Findings should prompt CBT practitioners to reflect and consider how their practice might be shaped through reports from YP as experts by experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Clinical Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)