Neonatal outcomes following one previous caesarean section.

NEONATAL intensive care; NEONATAL sepsis; CONFIDENCE intervals; VAGINAL birth after cesarean; NEONATAL diseases; DURATION of pregnancy; QUANTITATIVE research; RETROSPECTIVE studies; ACQUISITION of data; NEONATAL intensive care units; PATIENTS; PREGNANCY outcomes; RISK assessment; COMPARATIVE studies; HOSPITAL admission & discharge; MEDICAL records; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; CESAREAN section; LOGISTIC regression analysis; APGAR score; RESPIRATORY distress syndrome; ODDS ratio; LONGITUDINAL method; DISEASE risk factors

Background/Aims: Vaginal birth following a previous caesarean section is considered a safe option for subsequent births following personal planning and counselling. The aim of this study was to compare neonatal outcomes for both elective caesarean and vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section to aid decision making for women/pregnant people. Methods: This quantitative study used retrospective data from low-risk pregnant people/women at term with one previous caesarean section (n=392). Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of mode of birth on neonatal outcomes. Further descriptive analyses were carried out to explore the results and reasons for admission to neonatal unit. Results: Apgar scores were higher in the vaginal birth group compared to the elective repeat caesarean group. There were no differences in neonatal unit admissions by mode of birth. Conclusions: There is minimal difference in neonatal outcomes, regardless of intention for either vaginal birth following a previous caesarean section or elective repeat caesarean. To fully investigate the factors that impacted Apgar scores and neonatal unit admissions for these groups, a much larger sample is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]