Antimicrobial resistance in the risk society – a Danish study on how veterinarians and human medical doctors construct risk through blaming.

VETERINARY medicine; HEALTH policy; RESEARCH methodology; SOCIAL theory; MEDICAL care; INTERVIEWING; RISK assessment; QUALITATIVE research; CONCEPTUAL structures; DEFENSE mechanisms (Psychology); DRUG resistance in microorganisms; SCAPEGOAT; PHYSICIANS

This article deals with risk and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR is considered to be one of the major global public health threats in the twenty-first century. This article applies the ideas of Ulrich Beck and Mary Douglas about the relation between risk and blame to competing discourses about AMR. AMR is closely connected to the use of antimicrobials in livestock production and for preventing/treating human infection. Using qualitative interviews with professionals from the human medical sector and the agricultural sector in Denmark, the article shows how representatives from the two sectors frame and construct AMR risks by blaming each other. Our study shows how experts within the human medical and veterinarian fields construct their own risk assessments in relation to AMR by making claims that shift blame to the other sector. They create a distinction between 'us' and 'them' and a kind of 'otherness' that is used to identify risky behaviour and the overuse of antimicrobials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Health, Risk & Society is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)