Impact of Amputation of the Upper Limb and Prostheses on Perceptions of Competence, Warmth, and Functional Abilities.

Purpose/Objectives: This study investigated attitudes that young adults have toward individuals with amputation of the upper limb (AUL). Previous studies have found that people tend to feel sympathy toward these individuals, but they are also perceived as less competent in various situations. However, it is unclear if these perceptions are influenced by factors such as the cause of amputation, the gender of the amputee, whether they use a prosthesis or not, or the type of prosthesis. Research Method/Design: The survey included 469 participants from a university in the Southeastern United States. Participants rated pictures of individuals with or without amputation, and with and without prostheses after reading a brief background scenario. Images were rated using a semantic differential for competence and warmth, and a scale of functional ability. Results: Factorial analysis of variances produced significant main effects indicating individuals with AULs who used prostheses were rated with higher competence and ability than individuals with AULs who did not use prostheses. Females were rated with lower competence and ability, and higher warmth regardless of AULs status. Higher ability ratings were obtained for individuals with advanced technology prostheses as compared to body-powered prostheses. Conclusions/Implications: Our research shows that people generally hold positive attitudes toward individuals with AUL when they use prostheses. However, traditional stereotypes persist for those who do not. Negative biases toward women should be accounted for in disability stigma studies. The cause of amputation did not influence ratings. Prostheses that appear to be advanced technology positively influenced ratings of functional ability when compared to traditional body-powered types. Impact and Implications: Our research shows that young adults generally hold positive attitudes toward individuals with amputations of the upper limb when they use prostheses in terms of perceptions of competence, warmth, and functional abilities. However, traditional stereotypes persist for those who do not use prostheses. We found that females are viewed with less competence and less ability regardless of amputation status. This reflects persistent sex bias which should be accounted for in disability stigma studies. The cause of amputation did not influence attitudes. Prostheses that appear to be advanced technology positively influenced ratings of functional ability when compared to traditional body-powered types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Rehabilitation Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)