Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics Between Cold-Dampness Syndromes and HeatDampness Syndrome.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective • This study investigates the clinical characteristics of patients with two acute Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndromes. Methods • A retrospective study between January 2016 and January 2020 was conducted. A total of 89 patients with acute gouty arthritis were admitted to our hospital and were divided into two groups: the cold-dampness syndrome (CDR) group (38 patients) and the heat-dampness syndrome (HDR) group (51 patients). The comparison includes the differences in fever (>37.3°C), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) between these two groups. Results • The results indicated significantly higher levels of CRP and PCT in the HDR group compared to the CDR group (P < .001). Age emerged as the independent variable associated considerably with PCT and CRP levels. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of tophus cases between the groups (P < .001), while no statistically significant differences were observed in joint effusion or the number of joint swelling and pain between the two groups. Conclusions • Our study reveals that in acute gout, fever, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels differ significantly between cold-dampness and heat-dampness syndromes, with no observed association with the presence of tophi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine is the property of InnoVisions Professional Media and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)