Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.

ARTIFICIAL limbs; GRIP strength; MYOELECTRIC prosthesis; HEALTH outcome assessment; ARM; AMPUTEES; COMPARATIVE studies; COST analysis; QUALITY of life; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; RESEARCH funding

Purpose: To investigate the costs, quality of life, and user experiences associated with upper limb prosthesis use, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip compared to standard myoelectric hand prostheses (MHPs/SHPs). Materials and methods: The EQ-5D-5L to assess the quality of life, the patient-reported outcome measure to assess the preferred usage features of upper limb prosthesis (PUF-ULP), and a cost questionnaire (societal perspective) were completed by 242 prosthesis users (57% men; mean age = 58 years). Incremental cost-utility and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICUR/ICER) with respectively the EQ-5D-5L and PUFULP were calculated to compare MHPs with SHPs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. Netherlands Trial Registry number: NL7682. Results: The mean yearly total costs related to prosthesis use of MHPs (e54 112) and SHPs (e23 501) were higher compared to prostheses with tools/accessories (e11 977), body-powered (e11 298), and cosmetic/passive prostheses (e10 132). EQ-5D-5L and PUF-ULP scores did not differ between prosthesis types. ICUR was e-728 833 per quality-adjusted life year; ICER was e-187 798 per PUF-ULP point gained. Conclusions: Myoelectric prostheses, especially MHPs, were most expensive compared to other prostheses, while no differences in quality of life and user experiences were apparent. MHPs were not cost-effective compared to SHPs. When prescribing MHPs, careful consideration of advantages over SHPs is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Disability & Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)