Prohibited by Pity: Perceptions of the Warmth, Competence, and Sexual Rights of Women Labeled with Intellectual Disability.

Introduction: The paternalism characterizing pity has long been critiqued by people with disabilities, including for fueling the sexual rights restrictions of women labeled with intellectual disability (ID). We used Fiske's Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2002) framework to examine majority group women's perceptions of ID-labeled women and the relation of pity to their support for ID-labeled women's sexual rights and related policies. Methods: In 2020, we surveyed 307 majoritized (i.e., White, heterosexual, and cisgender) adult women in the U.S. through an online recruitment platform. We elicited their perspectives regarding four marginalized groups of women, including those who are labeled with ID, low-income, adolescents, and lesbians. Results: Women labeled with ID were viewed as more warm than competent and were regarded with pity more than other groups of marginalized women. Evaluations of competence were associated with support for sexual rights and related policies of ID-labeled women, but not women in the other marginalized groups. Conclusions: These results underscore disability scholars' and activists' concerns that pity is particularly directed toward ID-labeled women and that it may undermine others' support of their sexual rights and opportunities. Policy Implications: In response, we advocate for a broader conception of competence and greater social integration. To uphold inalienable sexual rights for all ID-labeled women, we argue for policies that entitle women to enhanced resources as they direct their own sexual lives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)