DAYTONSKI SPORAZUM I DAYTONSKI USTAV KAO OSNOVA ZA BOSANSKI SPORAZUM I BOSANSKI USTAV. (Croatian)

DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT AND DAYTON CONSTITUTION AS THE BASIS FOR THE BOSNIAN AGREEMENT AND THE BOSNIAN CONSTITUTION. (English)

In the context of the political philosophy of liberalism, the author analyzes the existence of assumptions that the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina legitimizes itself as a constitutional, democratic and legal state on the basis of the 1995 Constitution. Analyzing the functioning of the state of BiH on the basis of the Constitution from 1995, as well as the conditions and circumstances under which the Dayton Peace Agreement was concluded, the author concludes that there are no elementary assumptions that the state of BiH could be legitimized as a constitutional, democratic and legal state, that is, a state in which implements the principle of the rule of law. It is emphasized that the state of BiH is not an expression of the freely expressed will of the citizens and the people of BiH, as well as that the Dayton Constitution is not a confirmation of the existence of a social consensus of the people and citizens of BiH. In the author's opinion, the Dayton constitution can only represent a temporary and transitional solution, and by no means a permanent basis for the functioning of the state of BiH. In this sense, a constitutional revision is necessary, which would entail the adoption of a completely new constitution of BiH or a thorough reform of the existing one, the so-called of the Dayton Constitution. The Dayton Agreement and the Dayton Constitution are understood only as a basis for the construction of the "Bosnian Agreement" and the "Bosnian Constitution", and by no means as a permanent solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

U kontekstu političke filozofije liberalizma autor analizira postojanje pretpostavki da se država BiH, na osnovi Ustava iz 1995. godine, legitimira kao ustavna, demokratska i pravna država. Analizom funkcionisanja države BiH na osnovi Ustava iz 1995. godine, kao i uslova i okolnosti pod kojima je zaključen Daytonski mirovni sporazum, autor zaključuje da ne postoje elementarne pretpostavke da bi se država BiH mogla legitimirati kao ustavna, demokratska i pravna država, odnosno država u kojoj se ostvaruje načelo vladavina prava. Naglašava se da država BiH nije izraz slobodno izražene volje građana i naroda BiH, kao i da Daytonski ustav nije potvrda postojanja društvenog konsezusa naroda i građana BiH. Daytonski ustav po mišljenju autora može predstavljati samo privremeno i prelazno rješenje, a nikako trajnu osnovu za funkcionisanje države BiH. U tom smislu, nužna je ustavna revizija koja bi podrazumijevala donošenje potpuno novog ustava BiH ili temeljitu reformu postojećeg, tzv. Daytonskog ustava. Daytonski sporazum i Daytonski ustav se razumijevaju samo kao osnova za izgradnju „bosanskog sporazuma" i „bosanskog Ustava", a nikako kao trajno rješenje. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Pregled is the property of University of Sarajevo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)