Abstract: Objective: To compare the results of perinatal outcomes between Syrian refugees and Turkish women between 2016 and 2020. Methods: The birth results of 17,997 participants (Syrian refugees: 3579 and Turkish women: 14,418) who delivered in the Labor Department of our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Maternal age was younger (24.73 ± 6.08 vs. 27.4 ± 5.91 years, p < 0.001) and adolescent pregnancy rate was higher (19.4% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001) in Syrian refuges than in Turkish women. Bishop scores on admission (4.6 ± 1.6 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), birth weight (3088.19 ± 575.32 g vs. 3109.76 ± 540.89 g, p = 0.044), low birth weight (11.3% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.004), and the rate of primary cesarean deliveries (10.1% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001) were also statistically different. Additionally, the rates of anemia (65.9% vs. 29.2%, p < 0.001), preeclampsia (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), stillbirth (1.3% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), preterm premature rupture of membranes (2.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.002), and obstetric complications were different between the groups. Conclusions: This study showed that inadequate antenatal care, communication and language barrier problems in Syrian refugees caused some adverse perinatal outcomes. All birth data of Syrian refugees must be disclosed by the Ministry of Health to confirm the accuracy of our data. Significance: What is already known on this subject? Syrian refugees did not receive adequate antenatal care, and some adverse perinatal outcomes were observed more frequently due to communication and language barrier problems. What does this study add? This study showed that more planned-programmed antenatal care-follow-up services should be provided, communication and language problems should be minimized, refugees should benefit more from health services, and effective-appropriate contraception methods should be provided to reduce negative perinatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
No Comments.