Trastorno por Estrés Postraumático Complejo y Trastorno Límite de la Personalidad: El Debate Continúa. Propuesta de Diagnóstico Diferencial.

Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder: The Debate Continues. Differential Diagnosis Proposal.

BORDERLINE personality disorder; LITERATURE reviews; POST-traumatic stress disorder; INTERNATIONAL Statistical Classification of Diseases & Related Health Problems; DIFFERENTIAL diagnosis

Tras la inclusión en la CIE-11 del diagnóstico de trastorno por estrés postraumático complejo (TEPTc) en 2020, se han sucedido las publicaciones que debaten sobre la pertinencia o no de tal entidad y sobre su distinción del trastorno límite de la personalidad (TLP). En el presente artículo de reflexión se persigue: 1. conocer si el TEPTc y el TLP son entidades distintas; 2. conocer el estado de la cuestión respecto a este tema; y 3. proponer un diagnóstico diferencial que ayude a su discriminación. Para dar cuenta de las dos primeras cuestiones, se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica (no sistemática) de tipo cualitativo entre los años 2020 y 2022 (tiempo de vigencia del TEPTc en la CIE-11). En función de la información teórica y empírica hallada, y cumpliendo con el tercer objetivo, se propone un diagnóstico diferencial con el fin de arrojar luz a l a distinción nosológica entre ambos constructos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following the inclusion in the ICD-11 of the diagnosis of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (cPTSD) in 2020, there has been a succession of publications debating the relevance or not of this entity and regarding its distinction from borderline personality disorder (BPD). The present reflection article aims to: 1. to understand whether c-PTSD and BPD are different entities; 2. to understand the state of the art regarding this issue; and 3. to propose a differential diagnosis that will help to distinguish between the two. To account for the first two questions, a qualitative (non-systematic) literature review was carried out between 2020 and 2022 (the period of validity of cPTSD in the ICD-11). Based on the theoretical and empirical information found, and achieving the third objective, a differential diagnosis is proposed in order to shed light on the nosological distinction between the two constructs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Papeles del Psicólogo is the property of Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Psicologos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)