Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing? The Curvilinear Associations Among Chinese Adolescents' Perceived Parental Career Expectation, Internalizing Problems, and Career Development: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study.

Based on three-annual-wave data from 3,196 Chinese adolescents across the high school years (Mage = 15.55 years old, SD =.44; 52.8% girls at Wave 1, 10th grade), this study examined the curvilinear associations between adolescents' perceived parental career expectation and their career adaptability and ambivalence and also tested the potential mediating role of adolescents' internalizing problems in such associations. Results showed that, after controlling for a set of critical covariates and the baseline levels of outcome variables, there was an inverted U-shaped curvilinear association between adolescents' perceived parental career expectation at Wave 1 and their career adaptability at Wave 3 via adolescent internalizing problems at Wave 2. Similarly, a U-shaped curvilinear association also was identified between adolescents' perceived parental career expectation at Wave 1 and their career ambivalence at Wave 3 via their internalizing problems at Wave 2. These findings suggest that adolescents' perceived parental career expectation may have "too-much-of-a-good-thing" effects on their career development. Implications for future research and practice were discussed. Public Significance Statement: Findings of this study suggests that too high or too low levels of adolescents' perceived parental career expectation might contribute to adolescents' heightened levels of depressive and anxious symptoms, which, in turn, may ultimately compromise adolescents' career adaptability as well as increase adolescents' career ambivalence. Overall, this study yields empirical evidence supporting the "too-much-of-a-good-thing" effect of adolescents' perceived parental career expectation for adolescents' career development, particularly in the Chinese culture context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Counseling Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)