Sir Thomas More and the Tragedy of Citizenship.

CITIZENSHIP; DECENTRALIZATION in government; EMIGRATION & immigration; ECONOMICS; PHILOLOGY; EARLY Modern Period (Literary period)

This essay explores the historical and generic basis for a tragic reading of The Book of Sir Thomas More. The early modern period's dominant forms of tragedy (such as revenge tragedy and historical tragedy) typically focus on the dynastic-imperial struggles of aristocratic powers against the backdrop of centralization and state-building. Sir Thomas More inverts this representational hierarchy by leaving the monarch un-represented, relegating to the background the well-known factional conflicts that undergirded the Henrician Reformation. Instead, the play dramatizes the history of Tudor consolidation from the perspective of London's citizenry, who are made to grapple with the meaning of their own freedom in an age of mass migration. The result, I suggest, is a charter myth not of the nation-state but of London and its civic institutions: a tragic meditation on the place of the city and its citizens in the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Studies in Philology is the property of University of North Carolina Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)