Public attitudes toward organized labor.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Macdonald, David (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell). Jul2023, Vol. 104 Issue 4, p581-590. 10p. 3 Charts, 3 Graphs.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      DEMOCRATS (United States); LABOR union members; PARTISANSHIP; PUBLIC support; PUBLIC opinion; ATTITUDE change (Psychology)
    • Abstract:
      Objective: Despite declining and historically low membership, labor unions remain important and relevant actors in American politics. Accordingly, we have learned a good deal about the economic and political consequences of labor unions and union membership. However, we know less about the dynamics, determinants, and political consequences of public attitudes toward organized labor. Methods: I use a variety of survey data to (1) track public support for labor unions over time, (2) to examine the microlevel determinants of labor attitudes, and (3) to examine how such attitudes shape voting behavior in national elections. Results: First, I show that American public opinion has consistently been "pro‐labor" and that such sentiment is growing in recent years, despite historically low levels of union membership. Second, I show that while the strongest individual‐level correlate of union support is labor union affiliation, pluralities, and in some cases majorities, of nonunion‐affiliated Americans hold "pro‐labor" attitudes as well. Finally, I show that labor union attitudes significantly predict (among both union and nonunion‐affiliated Americans) support for the Democratic presidential candidate, net of partisanship, ideology, core political values, and macroeconomic conditions. Conclusion: Overall, these results show that low levels of union membership do not imply an "anti‐union" mass public. These findings also demonstrate that attitudes toward labor unions are politically consequential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)