Antipsychotics and obsessive–compulsive disorder/obsessive–compulsive symptoms: A pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

UNITED States. Food & Drug Administration; DRUG side effects; ANTIPSYCHOTIC agents; OBSESSIVE-compulsive disorder; NEUROLEPTIC malignant syndrome; TREATMENT failure; ODDS ratio

Objective: Antipsychotics have conflicting data with respect to obsessive–compulsive disorder/symptoms (OCD/OCS), with some reporting causality and some reporting treatment benefits. This pharmacovigilance study aimed to investigate reporting of OCD/OCS in association with the use of antipsychotics in comparison to one another, as well as treatment failure using data derived from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Data from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2020 on suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including OCD/OCS was obtained. The information component (IC) was used to determine a disproportionality signal, and reporting odds ratio (ROR) calculations were performed via intra‐class analyses to discern differences between the evaluated antipsychotics. Results: A total of 1454 OCD/OCS cases were utilized in IC and ROR calculations and 385,972 suspected ADRs were used as non‐cases. A significant disproportionality signal was seen with all second generation antipsychotics. Relative to other antipsychotics, only aripiprazole had a significant ROR of 23.87 (95% CI: 21.01–27.13; p < 0.0001). The ROR for antipsychotic treatment failure in those with OCD/OCS was highest with aripiprazole, and lowest with risperidone and quetiapine. Sensitivity analyses were largely in favor of the primary findings. Our analysis appears to implicate the 5‐HT1A receptor or an imbalance between this receptor and the D2‐receptor in antipsychotic treatment‐emergent OCD/OCS. Conclusions: In contrast to prior reports noting clozapine as the antipsychotic most commonly associated with de novo or exacerbated OCD/OCS, this pharmacovigilance study found aripiprazole was most frequently reported for this adverse effect. While these findings from FAERS offer a unique perspective on OCD/OCS with different antipsychotic agents, due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance studies they should ideally be validated through alternative prospective research studies involving direct comparisons of antipsychotic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)