Association Between Physician Empathy and Difficult Patient Encounters: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      Background: Physicians frequently experience patients as difficult. Our study explores whether more empathetic physicians experience fewer patient encounters as difficult. Objective: To investigate the association between physician empathy and difficult patient encounters (DPEs). Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Participants were 18 generalist physicians with 3–8 years of experience. The investigation was conducted from August–September 2018 and April–May 2019 at six healthcare facilities. Main Measures: Based on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) scores, we classified physicians into low and high empathy groups. The physicians completed the Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire-10 (DDPRQ-10) after each patient visit. Scores ≥ 31 on the DDPRQ-10 indicated DPEs. We implemented multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between physicians' empathy and DPE, adjusting for patient-level covariates (age, sex, history of mental disorders) and with physician-level clustering. Key Results: The median JSE score was 114 (range: 96–126), and physicians with JSE scores 96–113 and 114–126 were assigned to low and high empathy groups, respectively (n = 8 and 10 each); 240 and 344 patients were examined by physicians in the low and high empathy groups, respectively. Among low empathy physicians, 23% of encounters were considered difficulty, compared to 11% among high empathy groups (OR: 0.37; 95% CI = 0.19–0.72, p = 0.004). JSE scores and DDPRQ-10 scores were negatively correlated (r = −0.22, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Empathetic physicians were less likely to experience encounters as difficult. Empathy appears to be an important component of physician perception of encounter difficulty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)