Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
[Patient satisfaction with two different types of bladder catheters].
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Litherland AT;Litherland AT; Aas MS; Schiøtz HA
- Source:
Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke [Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen] 2006 Jan 12; Vol. 126 (2), pp. 153-4.
- Publication Type:
Comparative Study; English Abstract; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Language:
Norwegian
- Additional Information
- Transliterated Title:
Pasienttilfredshet med to typer blaerekatetre.
- Source:
Publisher: Norske Laegeforening Country of Publication: Norway NLM ID: 0413423 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0807-7096 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00292001 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Publication: Oslo : Norske Laegeforening
Original Publication: Chistiania : Alb. Cammermeyer, 1880-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Background: The insertion of a urinary catheter may cause some discomfort or pain. This study was done in order to compare patient-perceived discomfort with two commonly used coated urinary catheters for in-out catheterisation.
Material and Methods: A total of 196 women were randomised to be catheterised with one of two coated, hydrophilic catheters, either a Lofric or a SpeediCath catheter. Degree of discomfort was recorded on a 10 cm visual analogue scale.
Results and Interpretation: There was no difference in patient-perceived discomfort between the two catheters. The degree of discomfort was small with both catheters, with a median score of only 0.75 cm on the scale.
- Accession Number:
0 (Coated Materials, Biocompatible)
9002-86-2 (Polyvinyl Chloride)
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20060118 Date Completed: 20060126 Latest Revision: 20080716
- Publication Date:
20231215
- Accession Number:
16415935
No Comments.