РЕВОЛЮЦІЙНА ТРАДИЦІЯ В УКРАЇНІ: М. ДРАГОМАНОВ ТА І. ФРАНКО. (Ukrainian)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      REVOLUTIONARY TRADITION IN UKRAINE: M. DRAHOMANOV AND I. FRANKO. (English)
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Political tradition is an integral party of political culture. Political tradition captures political experience, acts as a mechanism of political heredity. In countries with a stable political culture, the political tradition occupies a worthy place in the field of research. The special significance of political tradition as an applied phenomenon of politics. Particularly striking applied, utilitarian significance of the political tradition is manifested in modern Russia 2.0. Three revolutions in Ukraine, socio-political conflicts in modern Ukraine force to find out the origins of social, mass behavior and theoretical approaches in understanding these phenomena. Ukrainian history and national political thought began to comprehend these processes in the second half of the nineteenth century, from the works of M. Kostomarov. Each society has its own tradition of conflict and its solutions. Drahomanov and Franco, Ukrainian intellectuals (late 19th century) reflect on social conflict and revolution. They recognize the revolution, but are afraid of its consequences. Their position has a number of reasons. Both M. Drahomanov and I. Franko are representatives of Western political culture and Western political tradition. Their Ukrainian-Russian and UkrainianAustrian roots only emphasize this feature. Both are well acquainted with the history of the world and the history of Europe. They know the intellectual tradition: from history to the present, they know and understand European social philosophy. M. Drahomanov and I. Franko take an active part not only in political life, but also in the political struggle. Ukrainian intellectuals are aware of the critical view of Ukrainian affairs and are not afraid to acknowledge the problems of the Ukrainian movement in the Russian and AustroHungarian empires. M. Drahomanov and I. Franko understand that the revolution will «accelerate» the course of history. But they are afraid of the brutality of the revolution on Ukrainian soil. And thus, a vicious circle is formed that brilliant thinkers are afraid to go beyond. Only the development of political movement, political conflict and external aggression broke this circle in December 1917. But without a doubt the analysis of revolutions and social conflicts carried out by representatives of Ukrainian political thought, give us the right to consider the leading representatives of the Ukrainian tradition of intellectual reflection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Hileya: Scientific Bulletin / Gileya is the property of GILEYA Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)