Forage yield and biological nitrogen fixation of pea–cereal intercrops for hay production.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Intercropping forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) or oat (Avena sativa L.) is an alternative way of cropping to improve forage yield and quality for hay production compared to monocropping. A 2‐year (2016–2017) field study was conducted at three sites in Saskatchewan, Canada, to evaluate forage production and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) of pea–cereal intercrops in comparison to pea, barley, and oat monocrops with and without 60 kg N ha−1 fertilization. Barley and oat were dominant (p < 0.001) in the intercrop by accounting for 65%–92% of the total dry matter (DM) yield. Compared to the pea monocrops, pea–cereal intercrops significantly increased forage DM yield at Melfort (52%–73%), Saskatoon (68%–118%), and Swift Current (25%–69%). At Melfort, nitrogen (N) fertilization increased total forage DM yield (p = 0.003) of monocrops and intercrops but it reduced N fixation by 22%–63% (p < 0.01). At Swift Current site, N fixation was reduced by 35%–65% (p = 0.019) when N fertilizer was applied. The total amount of N fixation varied from 18 kg N ha−1 (Swift Current) to 59 kg N ha−1 (Melfort), whereas the N transfer rate ranged from 17% (pea:oat) to 43% (pea:barley) in the intercrops. This study indicates that intercropping forage pea with forage barley or oat increased forage DM yield and N fixation. Effect of N fertilization on BNF was site specific, reducing N fixation of pea at two of three sites in the study. Core Ideas: Cereals (barley or oat) were dominant in the pea–cereal intercrops by accounting for 65%–92% of dry matter yield.In the intercrop, up to 43% of fixed N was transferred from pea to barley or oat.Application of 60 kg N ha−1 fertilizer reduced biological N fixation of pea both in monocrop and intercrop at two of three sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Agronomy Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)