Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Cyclic tensile force modifies calvarial osteoblast function via the interplay between ERK1/2 and STAT3.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
Background: Mechanical therapies, such as distraction osteogenesis, are widely used in dental clinics. During this process, the mechanisms by which tensile force triggers bone formation remain of interest. Herein, we investigated the influence of cyclic tensile stress on osteoblasts and identified the involvement of ERK1/2 and STAT3. Materials and methods: Rat clavarial osteoblasts were subjected to tensile loading (10% elongation, 0.5 Hz) for different time periods. RNA and protein levels of osteogenic markers were determined using qPCR and western blot after inhibition of ERK1/2 and STAT3. ALP activity and ARS staining revealed osteoblast mineralization capacity. The interaction between ERK1/2 and STAT3 was investigated by immunofluorescence, western blot, and Co-IP. Results: The results showed that tensile loading significantly promoted osteogenesis-related genes, proteins and mineralized nodules. In loading-induced osteoblasts, inhibition of ERK1/2 or STAT3 decreased osteogenesis-related biomarkers significantly. Moreover, ERK1/2 inhibition suppressed STAT3 phosphorylation, and STAT3 inhibition disrupted the nuclear translocation of pERK1/2 induced by tensile loading. In the non-loading environment, inhibition of ERK1/2 hindered osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, while STAT3 phosphorylation was elevated after ERK1/2 inhibition. STAT3 inhibition also increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation, but did not significantly affect osteogenesis-related factors. Conclusion: Taken together, these data suggested that ERK1/2 and STAT3 interacted in osteoblasts. ERK1/2-STAT3 were sequentially activated by tensile force loading, and both affected osteogenesis during the process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of BMC Molecular & Cell Biology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.