Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Keil, Holger; Beisemann, Nils; Swartman, Benedict; Schnetzke, Marc; Vetter, Sven Yves; Grützner, Paul Alfred; Franke, Jochen
- Source:
European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery; Feb2023, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p373-381, 9p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
Purpose: Intraoperative 3D imaging has become a valued tool in assessing the quality of reduction and implant placement in orthopedic trauma surgery. In our institution, 3D imaging is used routinely since 2001. To evaluate the intraoperative findings and consequences of this technique, intraoperative revision rates in cases with 3D imaging were analyzed. Methods: All operative procedures carried out with intraoperative 3D imaging between August 2001 and December 2016 were included. The scans were assessed intraoperatively and documented thereafter. In case of malreduction or misplaced implants, an immediate revision was performed. The number of scans per case as well as the findings and consequences drawn regarding the anatomical region were analyzed. Results: 4721 cases with 7201 3D scans were included in this study. The most common anatomical regions were the ankle (22.3%), the calcaneus (14.8%) and the tibial head (9.5%). In 19.1% of all cases, an intraoperative revision was performed. The highest revision rates were found with 36.0% in calcaneal fractures, 24.8% in fractures of the tibial plateau, 22.3% in injuries of the ankle. In 52.0% of revisions, the reduction was improved regarding intra-articular steps or joint congruency. In 30.5% an implant was corrected. Conclusion: Intraoperative revision due to results of 3D imaging was performed in almost one-fifth of cases. This illustrates the improved possibilities to detect malreduction and implant misplacements intraoperatively and thus the abilities to improve surgical outcome. Level of evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.