Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Cognitive Archaeology and Imaginary History at Great Zimbabwe.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Beach, David
- Source:
Current Anthropology. Feb1998, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p47-72. 26p. 5 Diagrams.
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
The archaeology ot Great Zimbabwe in southern Africa is well developed, but supporting evidence from other disciplines is scanty and often suspect. Consequently, the interpretation of many features of the city that flourished ca. 1200-1500 is difficult. Thomas Huffman's well-known reconstruction of the site's cognitive archaeology relies upon misunderstood documents, dubious oral traditions, and inappropriate comparisons to arrive at a picture of a city that was essentially static in its use of space for at least two centuries. An alternative interpretation is offered that draws upon Shona historical and anthropological sources and, explicitly, imagination to show how political processes within a Shona dynasty could have affected the building of the central part of the city. This model does not pretend to explain every feature of the site, nor does it claim to be more than one of several possible models of its kind. Nevertheless, it corresponds far more closely to the workings of Shona society, as it is known to us from history, than Huffmans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Current Anthropology is the property of University of Chicago Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.