Political opportunity, democracy, and 40 years of protest, 1981–2020: A cross‐national analysis.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Jami, Waleed A. (AUTHOR); Peoples, Clayton (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell). Nov2022, Vol. 103 Issue 6, p1440-1458. 19p. 5 Charts, 1 Graph.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: : Political opportunity is considered an important factor in any kind of activism, as it represents the context or norms in which a movement operates. Much of the extant literature has focused on political opportunity on a case‐by‐case basis with little consistency in its operationalization. Our goal in this study is to build toward a generalizable measure of political opportunity. To do so, we measured opportunities as democracy and used data from 90+ countries over a 40‐year period, testing the long‐theorized inverse‐U relationship between opportunity and protest. Methods: : We used all seven waves of the World Value Survey, which represents much of the world's countries, to examine the link between political opportunity and political behaviors (signing a petition, joining boycotts, and attending peaceful protests). Results: : Results confirmed the inverse‐U effect on all three protest behaviors; that is, middle‐of‐the‐road democracies had the highest levels of protest participation, whereas the most representative and most repressive societies had the lowest levels of protest participation. Conclusion: : Democracy can be used to represent important dimensions of political opportunity, as it was consistent with the long‐theorized inverse‐U. Moreover, our approach to using democracy, a cross‐national index, may serve as a stepping stone toward a unified and generalizable measure of political opportunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)