Predicting parents' decisions on MMR immunisation: a mixed method investigation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Gellatly J;Gellatly J; McVittie C; Tiliopoulos N
  • Source:
    Family practice [Fam Pract] 2005 Dec; Vol. 22 (6), pp. 658-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2005 Jul 15.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8500875 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0263-2136 (Print) Linking ISSN: 02632136 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Fam Pract Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Oxford : Oxford University Press, [c1983-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Increasing uptake rates for MMR vaccination requires an understanding of factors leading parents to decide for and against vaccination, particularly in the light of recent developments.
      Objective: We investigated factors relevant to immunising and non-immunising parents and the extent to which these factors predicted their decisions.
      Methods: The study was conducted in Edinburgh, UK. A two-stage mixed method design was used. Delphi technique elicited parents' views of factors relevant to MMR immunisation. Twenty-six factors identified as relevant were incorporated into a final questionnaire. Using cluster sampling, the final questionnaire was distributed to parents recruited through a group of local nurseries. 110 parents participated: eighty (72.7%) had had their child MMR vaccinated, thirty (27.3%) had refused the vaccine. The factors in the final questionnaire were analysed against vaccination status using a direct binary logistic regression model.
      Results: Four factors significantly predicted vaccination status, (prediction toward 'yes vaccination'). These were the influence of current research (OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.07-0.51), the helpfulness of leaflets and information packs (OR=3.27, 95% CI=1.38-7.75), the importance of eradication of rubella (OR=2.42, 95% CI=1.01-5.78), and the importance attached to the risk of adverse reactions (OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.48-0.87).
      Conclusions: Differences between immunising and non-immunising parents lie in the importance attached to four relevant factors. Excluding risk of adverse reactions, these factors have not been previously identified as salient and require to be explored further. Health advice to parents should highlight the identified importance attached to eradicating rubella and explicitly reflect research findings.
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20050719 Date Completed: 20060214 Latest Revision: 20181203
    • Publication Date:
      20240628
    • Accession Number:
      10.1093/fampra/cmi066
    • Accession Number:
      16024553