Effects of Worked Examples and External Scripts on Fallacy Recognition Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CONFIDENCE intervals; SOCIAL workers; INTERNET; MULTIVARIATE analysis; MEDICAL care; PROBLEM-based learning; ABILITY; TRAINING; CRITICAL thinking; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; PRE-tests & post-tests; CRONBACH'S alpha; PEARSON correlation (Statistics); T-test (Statistics); STUDENTS; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; CASE studies; ANALYSIS of covariance; STATISTICAL sampling; MEDICAL logic; EDUCATIONAL outcomes

To provide clients with the best possible treatment, social workers require fallacy recognition skills. Ideally, these skills are already acquired during university education. We conducted an experimental study with a 2 × 2 factorial design (and an additional baseline condition) with worked examples (with/without) and external scripts (with/without) as scaffolds to support social work students' (N=130) fallacy recognition skills during case-based reasoning on the exchange of fallacious arguments of social workers in the context of a web-based learning environment. Students significantly improved their fallacy recognition skills over time. During treatment, worked examples and external scripts yielded positive effects when presented in isolation, but not when combined. However, the effects of the two scaffolds could not be maintained in the posttest. Further systematic research is needed to identify principles for an effective design of additional instructional guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Social Work Education is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)