Factors associated with public support for a lockdown measure in China during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

PREVENTION of infectious disease transmission; HEALTH policy; MEDICAL masks; CONFIDENCE intervals; ATTITUDE (Psychology); MULTIPLE regression analysis; RISK perception; CONCEPTUAL structures; SEVERITY of illness index; PEARSON correlation (Statistics); QUESTIONNAIRES; DISEASE susceptibility; CHI-squared test; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; STAY-at-home orders; SOCIAL distancing; PUBLIC opinion; COVID-19 pandemic

The lockdown measures to contain the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in China in early 2020 was considered effective by the World Health Organization and many academics around the world. At the same time, the Western media labelled these measures as draconian. This research examined the reasons why the Chinese people were willing to support such measures. Based on an online survey of 528 Chinese participants, conducted in April 2020, the results revealed that the participants' instrumental attitudes (e.g., the outcome of the lockdown), but not experiential attitudes (i.e., the experience of the lockdown), were predictive of their support for a lockdown policy. Further analysis showed that those with higher communitarian worldviews had favourable instrumental attitudes and strong support regardless of the level of the perceived severity of the virus, whereas those with lower communitarian worldviews had more favourable instrumental attitudes and policy support when perceived severity was high than when it was low. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Asian Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)