迈向"LGBT+全纳教育":中学教育工作者的见解. (Chinese)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      Toward "LGBT+ Inclusive Education": Insights from Secondary School Educators. (English)
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      "Gay and lesbian education," as officially translated by the Ministry of Education, has been a part of the curriculum mandated by Taiwan's Gender Equity Education Act since 2004; yet, the implementation of the standard has faced strong resistance over the years. This research used qualitative methods to examine the pedagogic strategies and classroom experiences of nineteen secondary school educators with experience implementing gay and lesbian education. All of the interviewed educators began incorporating gay and lesbian education in the classroom after observing students struggle with coming out. As they advanced their understanding through professional development, they were able to realize their own past prejudices and reflect on existing double standards in the treatment of LGBT+ individuals. After learning how to implement gay and lesbian education in their own classrooms, these educators were eventually able to expand their influence to other areas of campus. Notably, effective strategies did not always require deliberate discussions of sexuality or gender. Ultimately, this study concludes the official term "gay and lesbian education" is far too narrow in scope and, instead, recommends the standard be renamed as "LGBT+ inclusive education" to more broadly reflect the diverse dimensions of gender. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      教育部官方翻译的《同性恋教育》, 已成为台湾《性别平等教育法》规定的课程的一部分自 2004 年以来;然而, 该标准的实施却面临着强大的阻力这些年。本研究采用定性方法检验教学策略和 19 位有经验的中学教育工作者的课堂经历实施同性恋教育。所有接受采访的教育工作者都开始在观察到学生的挣扎后, 将同性恋教育纳入课堂随着出来。当他们通过ߎ业发展加深理解时, 他们能够意识到自己过去的偏见并反思现有的双重标准在治疗 LGBT+ 个体方面。在学习了如何实施同性恋后在他们自己的教室里接受教育, 这些教育者最终能够扩大他们的影响到校园的其他领域。值得注意的是, 有效的策略并不总是需要故意讨论性或性别。最终, 这项研究得出了官方的结论"同性恋教育"一词的范围太窄, 建议将该标准重新命名为"LGBT+包容性教育", 以更广泛地反映多元化性别维度. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Curriculum Studies / Kecheng Yanjiu is the property of Angle Publishing Co., Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)