Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
RUSIJOS DISIDENTŲ TIPAI IKI IR PO SOVIETŲ SĄJUNGOS GRIŪTIES. (Lithuanian)
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): KAVALIAUSKAS, TOMAS
- Source:
Darbai ir Dienos; 2022, Issue 77, p101-122, 22p
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Alternate Title:
THE TYPES OF RUSSIAN DISSIDENTS BEFORE AND AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION. (English)
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
This article analyses statements, attitudes and values of Russian dissidents and public Kremlin critics. Concrete personalities have been chosen: classic soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovski, journalist Alekseij Navalnij, historian Jurij Dmitrijev, writer Aleksander Solzhenytcin, chess world champion Gary Kasparov, punk rock Pussy riots members Nadezhda Tolokonikova, Marija Aliochina and Jekaterina Samucevič, businessman Michail Chodorkovski, public intellectual and TV actor Aleksander Nevzorov, Yakutia (Siberia) shaman Gabishev. The difference between classic dissidents and public critics of Vladimir Putin's regime is analyzed. Attention is given to the fact that today is hard to talk about dissidents in the same sense as it was used to do it in the Soviet Union times. The article includes discussion about the danger of Kremlin's critics to become political prisoners and how the regime of Putin today has speeded up repression of freedom of speech. Especially after February 24th, 2022 when Russian army invaded Ukraine. The beginning of the article defines what is a dissident, then later the article provides a distinction between a dissident and public Kremlin's critic. The latter, who as a critic of Russian President Putin's authoritarian regime, does not necessarily is a dissident. At the end of the article the dissidents and public critics of contemporary Kremlin's authoritarian regime are grouped according to their status and demands for Putin to step down from the office. The author concludes that contradictions among values of the dissidents and public Kremlin critics show ideological differences, due to what one should not expect Russia to become like European Union in terms of legal and political standards even if/when the regime changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Šiame straipsnyje1 analizuojami Rusijos disidentų ir viešų Kremliaus kritikų pasisakymai, jų nuostatos bei vertybės. Pasirinktos savo veikla ir nuostatomis skirtingos asmenybės: Vladimiras Bukovskis, Aleksejus Navalnas, Jurijus Dmitrijevas („Memorial" istorikas), Aleksandras Solženicynas, Gary'is Kasparovas, grupės „Pussy Riot" narės Nadežda Tolokonikova, Marija Aliochina ir Jekaterina Samucevič, Michailas Chodorkovskis, Aleksandras Nevzorovas, Jakutijos šamanas Gabyševas. Analizuojamas skirtumas tarp klasikinio disidento ir viešųjų ryšių asmens. Atkreipiamas dėmesys į tai, jog sunku kalbėti apie disidentus ta prasme, kokia šis žodis buvo vartojamas Sovietų Sąjungoje. Aptariamas Kremliaus kritikų pavojus tapti politiniais kaliniais ir suintensyvėjusi laisvo žodžio represija. Straipsnio pradžioje apibrėžus, kas yra disidentas, vėliau straipsnyje atskiriamas disidentas nuo viešųjų ryšių asmens, kuris yra Rusijos prezidento Putino autoritarinio režimo kritikas, bet nebūtinai disidentas. Straipsnio pabaigoje sugrupuojami pasirinkti disidentai ir viešieji dabartinio Kremliaus kritikai, atsižvelgiant į jų statusą ir reikalavimus, keliamus siekiant nušalinti Rusijos prezidentą. Prieinama prie išvadų, kad prieštaringumai vertybėse tarp disidentų ir viešųjų Kremliaus kritikų rodo vertybines ir ideologines takoskyras, kurioms esant neverta tikėtis Rusijos supanašėjimo su Europos Sąjungos teisiniais ir politiniais standartais. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Darbai ir Dienos is the property of Vytautas Magnus University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.