After Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq: what is the future for the UN?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Tonge J;Tonge J
  • Source:
    Medicine, conflict, and survival [Med Confl Surviv] 2005 Jan-Mar; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 48-54.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: F. Cass Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9612305 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1362-3699 (Print) Linking ISSN: 13623699 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Confl Surviv Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : F. Cass, c1996-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      There have been enormous changes in the world order over the last 15 years, which have seen the United States, closely supported by the United Kingdom, become more unilateral in its actions, and in doing so damaging the United Nations. Attempts to create an ethical dimension in foreign policy have failed. The brief consensus after 9/11 has been lost in the war against terror, whilst other more appropriate measures to diminish the risks of terrorism, such as creating greater equity in trade and meeting the UN millennium goals, have been left to one side. Iraq and the ongoing failure to resolve the Palestinian issues have left the world a less safe place. The need for the UN to establish itself as a dominant force for global justice is paramount. To do so there must be reform, particularly of the Security Council.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20050205 Date Completed: 20050308 Latest Revision: 20191210
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/1362369042000315078
    • Accession Number:
      15690628